Firm News

Hicksons continues to grow with latest round of...

Hicksons is pleased to announce its latest promotions marking another step in our commitment to fostering legal talent and leadership.

Read more
Media & Podcasts

Dynamic Business: Building Defects: What They...

“It is important to remember that preventing defects not only protects professionals from legal issues but also contributes to their reputation, customer satisfaction, and the overall integrity of the construction industry.”   In a recent Dynamic Business article, Partner, Chloe Ellis sheds light on the legal implications of building defects and the challenges it presents for construction professionals. She also provides tips to navigating these issues effectively

Read more
Firm News

Hicksons 2023/24 Holiday Closure Period

Hicksons will be closed for a two-week duration over the Christmas and New Year period.

Read more

Stay up to date and receive our latest insights directly to your inboxSubscribe Now

Filter by
Filter
Blog
Update: NSW Court of Appeal endorses Justice Jackman’s criticism of the use of direct speech in affidavit evidence

Update: NSW Court of Appeal endorses Justice Jackman’s criticism of the use of direct speech in affidavit evidence

Following our recent blog on Kane’s Hire Pty Ltd v Anderson Aviation Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 381, the New South Wales Court of Appeal recently considered Justice Jackman’s criticism of the use of direct speech in affidavit evidence in Gan v Xie [2023] NSWCA 163. 
Blog
Recent criticism by the Federal Court: Use of direct speech in affidavit evidence

Recent criticism by the Federal Court: Use of direct speech in affidavit evidence

In the recent matter of Kane’s Hire Pty Ltd v Anderson Aviation Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 381, Justice Jackman criticised the current standard practice of recording conversations in affidavit evidence. In his judgement, Justice Jackman challenged the recording of conversations as direct speech in affidavit evidence, when the witness may 'only recall the ‘gist’ of a conversation, stating that the practice is ‘logically, ethically and grammatically wrong’.
Blog
Conflicting medical evidence? Why a clear diagnosis of consequential worker injury is essential.

Conflicting medical evidence? Why a clear diagnosis of consequential worker injury is essential.

In the recent case of Grant v Dateline Imports Pty Ltd [2022] NSWPICPD 3, the President of the Personal Injury Commission (PIC) confirmed that a clear diagnosis supporting an alleged consequential condition would aid in discharging the worker’s onus of proving an entitlement to lump sum benefits pursuant to s 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act).
Blog
Life or Death and a claim for privilege

Life or Death and a claim for privilege

The District Court of NSW was recently required to consider issues in relation to whether various documents relating to a factual investigation were privileged and if so, whether there had been a waiver of privilege as a result of an inadvertent disclosure of the documents.

  • 26 Oct 2017

Blog
“The customer is always right?”

“The customer is always right?”

Ms Young successfully sued Aldi in the District Court of NSW following an incident at an Aldi supermarket. Ms Young injured her knees and lower back after stumbling over the prongs of a pallet jack full of strawberries which was being unpacked by an Aldi employee. Aldi unsuccessfully argued that its employee made Ms Young aware of the pallet jack and therefore the pallet jack was an obvious risk. A finding of 10% contributory negligence was made. Aldi appealed.

Subscribe to Our Blog

Keeping you connected, Hicksons regularly publishes articles to keep you up to date on the latest developments. To receive these updates via email, please subscribe below and indicate which areas of law you would like to receive information on.

Top