122 Modern Awards - a confusing maze for business

Key Points
  • Most non-State Government employees are covered by one of 122 workplace awards
  • Determining which award applies in a workplace can be complex
  • Where a company gets it wrong, Fair work is pursuing and fining employers for award breaches

The Fair Work Ombudsman is vigorously prosecuting employers for breaches of awards and the Federal Court are making orders for very significant civil penalties where breaches are established.

Surely the 122 modern awards that cover most (non-state-government) employees, clearly define which employees/businesses they cover? Otherwise – how would a business know its obligations and employees know their entitlements?
 
For some businesses the question is relatively clear. For example, if a business is operating a GP practice and employs health support staff, then most of them will be covered by either the Health Professionals and Support Services Award 2010 or the Nurses Award 2010. However, there are many businesses where it is not so clear cut. As a result, there are many businesses where they pay their staff under the wrong award.
 
So what?  Well, the Fair Work Ombudsman is vigorously prosecuting employers for breaches of awards and the Federal Court are making orders for very significant civil penalties where those breaches are established.
 
By definition, if you (as an employer) are paying an employee under an incorrect award, – there’s a real risk that you (as the employer) are in breach of the correct award and liable to face a civil penalty.
 
A recent simple example that came before the Federal Circuit Court highlights the confusion so many businesses face.
 
In this case, the business was a start-up providing a novel service out of airports where customers left their cars with the company and those cars were then hired out other people. So… was it a car storage company or a car hire company?   The court held that, it was essentially a hire car business. 
 
The worker who made the claim had been employed as an assistant manager.
 
The worker believed that he was employed under the Clerks Private Sector Award 2010.
 
The employer thought the worker was covered by the, less onerous, Miscellaneous Award 2010. 
 
As it turns out, the Federal Circuit Court decided that they were both wrong. 
 
The Federal Circuit Court came to an entirely different view and decided that, because it was a car hire company, that meant its business was effectively classified as a retail outlet and, therefore, the worker was covered by the General Retail Industry Award 2010.
 
This meant that the worker was entitled to make a claim for overtime and penalty rates.  More concerning for the employer, for each breach (i.e. incidence of underpayment of an entitlement), a civil penalty of up to $63,000 could be imposed by the court upon the employer. 
 
Those penalties – even for a “first offence” – can amount to $100,000+.
 
To avoid the risk of a potentially crippling penalty – employers need to get advice from an expert employer lawyer – to be certain they are meeting their obligations to their workers under the right award.

Post by Warwick Ryan 

Most Popular Articles

Blog

When can the unqualified be qualified? Non-lawyers engaging in legal practice - when is it OK and when is the law broken

Only lawyers can provide legal advice, but anyone can provide legal information. When thinking of the difference, you might ask your friend or colleague to provide information about a serious illness; however you would seek out a qualified medical professional in relation to its treatment.
Blog

Service of Notices by Registered Post

Where service of a notice is authorised or required by post, unless the contrary intention appears, service will be deemed to be effected at the time when the notice would be delivered in the ordinary course of post: see the various Acts Interpretation acts of the States and Commonwealth.
Blog

Thanks, but no thanks – I don’t want to inherit

It seems odd that anybody would reject an inheritance, but for some beneficiaries, there are valid reasons they do not wish to receive their inheritance.

Subscribe to Our Blog

Keeping you connected, Hicksons regularly publishes articles to keep you up to date on the latest developments. To receive these updates via email, please subscribe below and indicate which areas of law you would like to receive information on.

Top