Say bye to 5 year grace periods

Key Points
  • Trade mark grace periods for non-use removal applications has been reduced to 3 years.
  • Trade mark owners will now need to use its registered trade mark within 3 years from the date on which the trade mark is registered.
  • These changes affect trade marks applied for on or after 24 February 2019


As a result of the Productivity Commission’s inquiry into Australia’s intellectual property arrangements, the initial grace period before someone can file a non-use application to remove a registered trade mark has been reduced from 5 years to 3 years.

What does it mean?

Anyone can now file a non-use application to remove a registered trade mark on the basis that the registered trade mark has not been used for 3 years from the date of registration. Previously, an application to remove a trade mark on the basis of “non-use” could only be filed 5 years after the date the trade mark application was filed.

It is important to note that the changes not only affect the length of the initial grace period, it also changes when the grace period clock starts –now being the date the trade mark is registered on the trade marks register. Previously, the initial grace period was calculated from the date the trade mark application was filed.

A trade mark owner will no longer be afforded a 5-year initial grace period to start using its registered trade mark(s). A trade mark owner will now need to ensure its registered trade mark(s) is used within 3 years from the date on which the trade mark is registered.

Changes to the initial grace period will only affect trade marks that were applied for on or after 24 February 2019. If you filed a trade mark application before 24 February 2019, and the trade mark is registered, you will still have the benefit of the initial 5-year grace period.

If you are unsure whether your business will be affected by these changes, please do not hesitate to contact us. 

Post by Quincy Wong and Donna Lin

Most Popular Articles

Blog

When can the unqualified be qualified? Non-lawyers engaging in legal practice - when is it OK and when is the law broken

Only lawyers can provide legal advice, but anyone can provide legal information. When thinking of the difference, you might ask your friend or colleague to provide information about a serious illness; however you would seek out a qualified medical professional in relation to its treatment.
Blog

Service of Notices by Registered Post

Where service of a notice is authorised or required by post, unless the contrary intention appears, service will be deemed to be effected at the time when the notice would be delivered in the ordinary course of post: see the various Acts Interpretation acts of the States and Commonwealth.
Blog

Thanks, but no thanks – I don’t want to inherit

It seems odd that anybody would reject an inheritance, but for some beneficiaries, there are valid reasons they do not wish to receive their inheritance.

Subscribe to Our Blog

Keeping you connected, Hicksons regularly publishes articles to keep you up to date on the latest developments. To receive these updates via email, please subscribe below and indicate which areas of law you would like to receive information on.

Top